انقلاب اسلامی و نظم منطقه ای ایرانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تهران .

چکیده

نظم منطقه‌ای ایرانی دارای تاریخ بسیار طولانی است که سابقه آن به دوره هخامنشیان مربوط می‌شود. فروپاشی ساسانیان، پایانی بر الگوی منطقه‌گرایی ایرانی یعنی ساتراپی بود. با شکل‌گیری نظم وستفالی، نظم‌های منطقه‌ای در قالب ژئوپلتیک نمایان شده و ایران در این دوره، تحت سیطره چنین نظمی قرار گرفت. انقلاب اسلامی به عنوان یک نوپدید و همزمان شدن آن با تکامل سیستم بین‌الملل از ساده به پیچیده- آشوبی، دستگاه تحلیلی نوینی را برای نظم منطقه‌ای ایرانی ضروری می‌سازد که ادبیات روابط بین‌الملل ایرانی به آن نپرداخته و  در این حوزه، دارای عقب‌ماندگی جدی هستند. بر این اساس پرسش اصلی پژوهش، بر این محور شکل می‌گیرد؛ پیامدهای انقلاب اسلامی بر نظم منطقه‌ای ایران چیست؟ پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از نظریه سیستم‌های پیچیده و آشوبی و همچنین با کاربست روش آبداکشن که بر تبیین واقعیت‌های نوپدید و یافتن بهترین تبیین متمرکز است؛ سعی در ارائه پاسخ قانع‌کننده و ارایه دستگاه تحلیلی نوین در این حوزه دارد. نویسنده نشان می‌دهد؛ نظم منطقه‌ای شبکه‌ای با دو ویژگی برجسته پانارکی و هیترارکی از جمله نوآوری انقلاب اسلامی در حوزه نظم منطقه‌ای ایرانی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Islamic Revolution and the Iranian Regional Order.

نویسنده [English]

  • Farhad Ghasemi
Associate Professor of International Relations, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

The Iranian regional order has a very long history, dating back to the Achaemenid period. The collapse of the Sassanid was the end of the pattern of Iranian regionalism, namely the satrapy. With the formation of the Westphalian order, regional orders emerged in the form of geopolitics. During this period, Iran came under the control of such an order. The Islamic Revolution as emergence and its coincidence with the evolution of the international system from simple to complex-chaotic necessitates a new analytical apparatus for the Iranian regional order that the international relations literature has not addressed and in this field, they are seriously inefficient. Based on this reality, the main research question is based on what are the consequences of the Islamic Revolution on the regional order of Iran? The author tries to provide a convincing answer and a new analytical apparatus in this field by using the theory of complex and chaotic systems and also by applying the abduction method which focuses on explaining emerging facts and finding the best explanation. The author illustrates that network regional order with two characteristics including panarchy and heterarchy is an innovation by the Islamic revolution in the field of Iranian regional order.

Keywords

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Islamic Revolution
  • Iranian Regional Order
  • Complex-Chaotic International System
  • Bifurcated Order
  • Multilevel Control

مراجع

  • آذری، علاءالدین (1354) ،"پژوهش درباره شهرب‌ها"، مجله بررسی‌های تاریخی، سال10، شماره 6، صص 37-61.
  • احتشام، مرتضی (1354)، ایران در زمان هخامنشیان، تهران، چاپخانه زر.
  • داندامایف، محمد آ (1381)، تاریخ سیاسی هخامنشیان، ترجمه: خشایار بهاری، تهران: نشر کارنگ.
  • ﻣﺸﻜﻮر، ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻮاد، (1367)، اﻳﺮان در ﻋﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎن: در ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ اﻗﻮام و ﭘﺎدﺷﺎﻫﺎن ﭘﻴﺶ از اﺳـﻼم، چ ﭘـﻨﺠﻢ، ﺗﻬﺮان: اﻧﺘﺸﺎرات اﺷﺮﻓﻲ.
  • ﻣﻠﻚ‌زاده، ﻓﺮخ (1351)، "ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﺎﺗﺮاﭘﻲ‌ﻫﺎی ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ در ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﺨﺎﻣﻨﺸﻲ"، ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ‌ﻫـﺎی ﺗـﺎرﻳﺨﻲ، ﺗﻬﺮان: ﺷﻤﺎرة ﺷﺸﻢ، ﺳﺎل ﻫﻔﺘﻢ، ﺻﺺ 29ـ 15.
  • هرودوت (1389)، تاریخ هرودوت .ترجمه‌ی مرتضی ثاقبفر. تهران: اساطیر.
  • یوسف جمالی، محمدتقی ایمان‌پور، علی‌اکبر شهابادی (1392)، نقش و جایگاه ساتراپی‌ها در شاهنشاهی هخامنشی. تاریخ اسلام و ایران، سال 8، شماره 23، صص 89-110.

 

  • Abdollah, A. (2017). "Islamic revolution and the new regionalism in the middle east", Geography, 14(5), pp., pp.501-521.
  • Adib-Moghaddam, A. (2008). Iran in World Politics: The Question of the Islamic Republic. Hurst & Co; New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ahmadian, H. (2018). "Iran and Saudi Arabia in the Age of Trump". Survival, 60(2), pp.133-150.
  • Akbarzadeh, S. (2015). "Iran and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Ideology and realpolitik in Iranian foreign Policy". Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(1), 88-103.
  • Albrecht-Carrié, R., Dehio, L., & Fulman, C. (1963). The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power In: JSTOR.
  • Anderson, B., & Vongpanitlerd, S. (2013). Network analysis and synthesis. Dover Publications.
  • Andriani, P. (2011). "Complexity and innovation". The SAGE handbook of complexity and management, pp.454-470.
  • Andriani, P. a. G. (2004).complexity theory and the management of network. Proceedings of the Workshop on Organizational Networks as Distributed Systems of Knowledge. London: Imperial College Press.
  • Brandes, U. (2005). Network analysis: methodological foundations (Vol. 3418): Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Daher, A. (2018). “Regional patronage and war-fomenting polarization: The rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia in Lebanon”. Critique international (3), pp. 155-177.
  • Downes, M. (2018). Iran's unresolved revolution: Routledge.
  • Farmer, J. D. (1985). "Sensitive dependence on parameters in nonlinear dynamics". Physical review letters, 55(4), 351.
  • Fawcett, L. (2015). "Iran and the regionalization of (in) security". International Politics, 52(5),pp. 646-656 .
  • Fiedler, R. (2018). Beyond Europe: Politics and Change in Global and Regional Affairs, Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
  • Fox, W. (1985). Geopolitics and international relations. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Friedman, B. (2018). “Iran's Hezbollah Model in Iraq and Syria: Fait Accompli?” Orbis, 62(3), PP.438-453.
  • Gasiorowski, M. J. (1991). US foreign policy and the Shah: Building a client state in Iran. Cornell University Press.
  • Goldstein, J. (2011).” Emergence in complex systems”. The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management, ISBN 9781847875693, pp. 65-78.
  • Goldstein, J. S. (1988). Long cycles: Prosperity and war in the modern age: Yale University Press.
  • Golkarami, A., Motaghi, A., & Rabiee, H. (2018). "Geopolitical explanation for foreign policy of islamic republic Iran. Journal of Geographical science, 18(49), pp37-57.
  • Gómez-Gardenes, J., Reinares, I., Arenas, A., & Floría, L. M. (2012).” Evolution of cooperation in multiplex Networks”. Scientific reports, 2(1), 1-6.
  • Hazy, J. K. (2011). "More than a metaphor: Complexity and the new rules of management. ". Allen, S. Maguire. & B. McCelvey., Sage Handbook of complexity and Management, Los Angeles 524Y539, London, SAG.
  • Herzig, E (2002).”Regionalism, Iran and Central Asia”. International Affairs, 80(3), pp.503-517.
  • Javadi Arjmand, M.j (2009).”Iran 1400 outlook document and foreign policy of Islamic republic of Iran” political quarterly, 39(1).Khamenei, S. A. (2019). http://farsi.khamenei.ir/message-content?id=41673.
  • Kleinknecht, A. (1987). Innovation patterns in crisis and prosperity: Schumpeter's long cycle reconsidered: Macmillan.
  • Kumar, S. (2003). "Power cycle analysis of india, china, and Pakistan in regional and global politics." International Political Science Review, 24(1), pp.113-122.
  • Levy, J. S. (2003). "Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions, and Research Design.” In John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman, eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Leibowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994). "Network externality: An uncommon tragedy." The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), pp.133-150.
  • MACINTOSH, R., & MACLEAN, D. (1999). "Conditioned emergence: A dissipative structures approach to Transformation". Strategic management journal, 20(4), pp.297-316.
  • Malone, D. M., & Mukherjee, R. (2010). "India and China: conflict and cooperation." Survival, 52(1), 137-158.
  • Martínez‐López, B., Perez, A., & Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, J. (2009). "Social network analysis. Review of general Concepts and use in preventive veterinary medicine". Transboundary and emerging diseases, 56(4),pp. 109-120 .
  • Merali, Y., & Allen, P. (2011). "Complexity and systems thinking." The SAGE handbook of complexity and Management, 3, pp.1-52.
  • Modelski, G. (1978). "The long cycle of global politics and the nation-state." Comparative studies in society and History, 20(02), pp.214-235.
  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Religion and Regional Planning: The Case of the Emerging'Shi'a Region'. Promoting Conflict or Peace through Identity. Ashgate Publishing Company.
  • Mohammadi, M. (2012). "The Islamic republic of Iran and the international system: clash with the domination Paradigm". In Iran and the International System (pp. 83-101): Routledge.
  • Monier, E. (2014). "The Arabness of Middle East regionalism: the Arab Spring and competition for discursive Hegemony between Egypt, Iran and Turkey." Contemporary Politics, 20(4), pp.421-434.
  • Moulines, C. U. (2002). "Complexity and Emergence." In Complexity and Emergence, Proceedings Of The Annual Meeting Of the International Academy Of The Philosophy Of Science (p. 29). World Scientific.
  • Nicolis, G., & Nicolis, C (2012) .Foundations of complex systems: emergence, information and predication: World Scientific.
  • Paul, T. V. (2005). The India-Pakistan conflict: an enduring rivalry: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paul, T. V., Wirtz, J. J., & Fortmann, M. (2004). Balance of power: theory and practice in the 21st century: Stanford University Press.
  • Paunic, N. (2016). "The Rising Shi’a Crescent: Iranian Smart Power and Implications for the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Persian Gulf." Carleton Review of International Affairs, 3, pp.70-92.
  • Perthes, V. (2018). "Conflict and Realignment in the Middle East". Survival, 60(3), 95-104.
  • Rakel, E. P. (2007). "Iranian foreign policy since the Iranian Islamic Revolution: 1979-2006". Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 6(1), pp.159-187.
  • Rosecrance, R. (1987). "Long cycle theory and international relations." International Organization, 41(02), 283-301.
  • Ruelle, D. (1979). "Sensitive dependence on initial condition and turbulent behavior of dynamical systems." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 316(1), pp.408-416.
  • Seifried, R. (2014). Dynamics of underactuated multibody systems. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Shlaim, A. (1995). War and peace in the Middle East, A Concise History. New York. Tuathail, G. Ó ,.Toal, G.,
  • Dalby, S., & Routledge, P. (1998). The geopolitics reader: Psychology Press.
  • Ulutaş, U., & Duran, B. (2018). “Traditional Rivalry or Regional Design in the Middle East?” Insight Turkey, 20(2), pp. 81-106.
  • Venetis, E. (2011). "The Rising power of Iran in the Middle East: Forming an axis with Iraq, Syria and Lebanon." Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy Working Paper.
  • Wagner, M. (2016). "Emergence and Complexity in the International System: Developing a Social Ontology of International Relations". In Social Emergence in International Relations (pp. 79-141): Springer.
  • Walt, S. M. (1985). "Alliance formation and the balance of world power." International Security, 9(4), pp. 3-43.
  • Wastnidge, E. (2017)." Central Asia in the Iranian geopolitical imagination." Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1.
  • Wohlforth, W. C., Little, R., Kaufman, S. J., Kang, D., Jones, C. A., Hui, V. T.-B., . . . Brenner, W. L. (2007). "Testing balance-of-power theory in world history". European Journal of International Relations, 13(2), pp. 155-185.
  • Zou, C. (2020). "Map of World Energy." In New Energy (pp. 23-50): Springer.
  • Zweiri, M. (2016). "Iran and Political Dynamism in the Arab World: the Case of Yemen". Digest of Middle East Studies, 25(1), pp.4-18.
جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی جهان اسلام
دوره 9، شماره 18 - شماره پیاپی 18
فروردین 1400
صفحه 110-138

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 فروردین 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 مهر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار