Presenting a model for measuring the impact of social media on Political Developments in Turkey

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Ph.D Student in Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

One of the tools that has been able to greatly influence the political and cultural developments of different societies in recent years is social media. By providing a space for extensive communication, exchange of information, and expression of different thoughts and opinions, these media have played an important role in shaping the political behaviors of citizens. This research was conducted to investigate this issue using the latest wave of data from the Global Values ​​Survey on Turkey. In this regard, the secondary data statistical analysis method and SPSS software were used to answer the research questions, and they were analyzed using statistical methods. The descriptive results of the research show that the level of social media use among Turkish citizens is high, their tendency towards secular and emancipatory values ​​is low, and their tendency towards democracy is high. The inferential results also indicate that, firstly, social media in Turkey has had a negative and significant effect on democracy and has reduced people's tendency towards democracy. Secondly, the results indicate that although social media increases and strengthens citizens' tendency towards democracy through the mediating variable of emancipatory values, the same media negatively affects democracy and reduces citizens' tendency towards democracy through the mediating variable of secular values.
Extended Abstract
Social media has become one of the most important factors influencing political and cultural developments in societies in the last two decades, and its role in strengthening or weakening democracy has become a controversial issue in the literature of political science and communication. The present study aims to provide a model for measuring the impact of social media on democratic political culture in Turkey and attempts to examine this impact not only directly, but also through two mediating variables: “liberation values” and “secular values”. The choice of Turkey as a case study is important because this country has experienced significant fluctuations in the democratization process over the last two decades; in such a way that after democratic growth in the 2000s, it has faced a downward trend in democracy indicators since the 2010s. This situation provides a suitable context for analyzing the dual function of social media.
The theoretical framework of the research is developed using actor-network theory, mediatization of politics theory, network governance theory, and Castells’s network society perspective. Based on these approaches, social media are not simply neutral tools for transmitting messages, but rather play an active role as a network of human and non-human actors (users, algorithms, platforms, and political institutions) in shaping public opinion and political culture. Also, relying on Inglehart and Welzel’s value transformation theory, it is assumed that emancipatory values ​​(including individual autonomy, gender equality, the right to choose, and acceptance of citizens’ voices) and secular-rational values ​​can mediate the path of social media’s impact on democracy.
The research method is quantitative and based on the analysis of secondary data from the seventh wave of the Global Values ​​Survey (2020) in Turkey. The sample size was 2415 Turkish citizens, and the data were analyzed using SPSS software and the bootstrap path analysis method (Preacher and Hayes). The independent variable was the amount of social media use for news; the mediating variables were emancipatory values ​​and secular values; and the dependent variable was democratic political culture (based on support for free elections, civil liberties, equal rights, and opposition to authoritarianism).
Descriptive findings show that the amount of social media use among Turkish citizens is above average. In contrast, the average of emancipatory values ​​and secular values ​​was assessed to be below average, indicating the continued weight of traditional values ​​in Turkish society. However, the average tendency towards democratic political culture was relatively high, indicating the existence of democratic attitudes at the societal level.
The analytical results show that social media has a direct and significant negative effect on democracy; That is, the increase in the use of these media has been accompanied by a decrease in the tendency towards democratic political culture. This finding is consistent with views that emphasize the role of social media in spreading polarization, spreading misinformation, and weakening public trust. However, the mediation analysis shows that the effect of social media on democracy is not uniform and simple. Specifically, social media has a positive and significant effect on the tendency towards democracy by reinforcing emancipatory values, but it has a negative and significant effect on democracy by reinforcing secular values. Therefore, the function of social media in Turkey is dual and depends on the value paths that are activated.
The coefficient of determination of the model shows that the included variables explain about 4.7% of the variance in democracy; therefore, a major part of the changes in democracy are related to other structural, institutional, and economic factors. However, the significance of the direct and indirect paths indicates that social media, as one of the new cultural-communication variables, plays a role in shaping democratic attitudes.
Overall, the research findings show that the impact of social media on democracy in Turkey is neither entirely positive nor entirely negative, but rather conditional and multifaceted. These media can help deepen democratic culture by strengthening emancipatory values, but at the same time, they can weaken it through some value developments and political-institutional contexts. Therefore, the impact of social media on democracy depends on the social context, the level of institutionalization of democracy, and the type of interaction between technology, values, and power structure. This result emphasizes the need for more case studies and avoiding generalizations about the relationship between social media and democracy.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • بیگدلو، مهدی و هادیان، ناصر (1397)، «تأثیر کارکردهای شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر سمت‌گیری‌های فرهنگ سیاسی کاربران دانشگاهی در ایران (مطالعه موردی وایبر و تلگرام)»، جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی جهان اسلام، دوره 6، شماره 12، صص 73-104. 22070/iws.2018.2776.1487
  • توکلی، فائزه (1390)، «نقش رسانه‌ها در دموکراسی فرهنگی جهان معاصر»، مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در رسانه و فرهنگ، دوره 1، شماره 1، صص 98-85.

https://mediastudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_201.html

  • خواجه نایینی، علی (1394)، «درآمدی تحلیلی بر نقش شبکه‌های سیاستی در سیاست‌گذاری عمومی»، فصلنامه دولت‌پژوهی، 1 (3)، 175-147. https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2016.2455
  • خیری، علی و کریمی، علی. (1398)، «توسعه سیاسی در ترکیه، چشم‌اندازی آینده‌پژوهانه»، جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی جهان اسلام، دوره 7، شماره 15، صص 109-138.

10.22070/iws.2019.4036.1727

  • دینانی، ابتسام، آذری، طاهره (1391)، «نظریه شبکه و کاربرد آن در خانواده»، مطالعات رسانه‌ای، دوره 7، شماره 3، صص 169-157.

https://sanad.iau.ir/ar/Journal/mediastudies/Article/792178/FullText

  • ریتزر، جورج (1390)، نظریه‌های جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه هوشنگ نایبی، تهران: نشر نی.
  • شکرخواه، یونس، سعیدآبادی، محمدرضا، نام‌آور، عبدالرضا (1399)، «ارائه مدلی برای تأثیر شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر توسعه دموکراسی در ایران: یک مطالعه داده‌بنیاد»، مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، دوره 6، شماره 24، صص 36-1. https://doi.org/10.22054/nms.2021.47781.856
  • صادقیان، حسن، اسدی، عباس (1398)، «میزان تأثیرگذاری رسانه‌های اجتماعی و مجازی بر فرایند دموکراتیزاسیون: مطالعه موردی دولت حزب عدالت و توسعه ترکیه از سال 2002 تا کنون»، فصلنامه علوم خبری، دوره 8، شماره 30، صص 194-175.

https://www.mjourcom.ir/article_113769.html

  • کاستلز، مانوئل (1380)، عصر اطلاعات: اقتصاد، جامعه و فرهنگ؛ ظهور جامعه شبکه‌ای، ترجمه افشین خاکباز و احمد علیقلیان، تهران: انتشارات طرح نو.
  • مهدی‌زاده، شراره، شیفته، منصوره (1398)، «تأثیر شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر تحقق دموکراسی دیجیتال: مطالعه موردی دانشجویان دانشگاه مازندران»، انجمن ایرانی مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، دوره 15، شماره 55، صص 151-131. 22034/jcsc.2019.36674
  • مهدی‌زاده، محمد (1391)، نظریه‌های رسانه: اندیشه‌های رایج و دیدگاه‌های انتقـادی، تهران: همشهری
  • هاشمیان، محمدحسین، انواری، محمدرضا (1396)، «دلالت‌های نظریه کنشگر شبکه در سیاست‌گذاری فرهنگی: تعامل تکنولوژی و انسان در سیاست‌گذاری»، دین و سیاست فرهنگی، دوره 5، شماره 10، صص 64-37 . https://www.jrcp.ir/article_81056.html
  • Aday, S., Farrell, H., Lynch, M., Sides, J., Kelly, J., & Zuckerman, E. (2010). Blogs and bullets: New media in contentious politics. United States Institute of Peace, 65, 1-31.
  • Akser, M., & Baybars-Hawks, B. (2012). Media and democracy in Turkey: Toward a model of neoliberal media autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 5(3), 302-321.

https://doi.org/10.1163/18739865-00503011

  • Bigdalo, M., & Hadian, N. (2018). The impact of social networking functions on the political culture orientations of university users in Iran (a case study of Viber and Telegram). Political Sociology of the Islamic World, 6 (12), 73-104. 22070/iws.2018.2776.1487 [In Persian]
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer-mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Castells, M. (2001). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture; The Rise of the Network Society, Translated by Afshin Khakbaz and Ahmad Aliqolian, Tehran: Tarh No Publications. [In Persian]
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, communication & society, 4(4), 615-633.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097030

  • Diamond, L. (2015). Liberation technology 1. In In search of democracy (pp. 132-146). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685175-7
  • Dinani, A., & Azari, T. (2012). Network Theory and Its Application in the Family. Media Studies, 7 (3), 157-169.

https://sanad.iau.ir/ar/Journal/mediastudies/Article/792178/FullText

  • Hashemian, M., & Anvari, M. (2017). Implications of Network Actor Theory in Cultural Policy-Making: Interaction of Technology and Humans in Policy-Making. Religion and Cultural Politics, 5 (10), 37-64.

https://www.jrcp.ir/article_81056.html [In Persian]

  • Jha, C. K., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2020). Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(2), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.010
  • Khairy, A., & Karimi, A. (2019). Political development in Turkey, a futures perspective. Political Sociology of the Islamic World, 7 (15), 109-138.

10.22070/iws.2019.4036.1727 [In Persian]

  • Khajeh Nayini, A. (2015). An analytical introduction to the role of political networks in public policy-making. Quarterly Journal of State Studies, 1 (3), 175-147. https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2016.2455 [In Persian]
  • Mehdizadeh, M. (2012). Media Theories: Popular Thoughts and Critical Perspectives, Tehran: Hamshahri. 22034/jcsc.2019.36674 [In Persian]
  • Mehdizadeh, S., & Shifteh, M. (2019). The Impact of Social Networks on the Realization of Digital Democracy: A Case Study of Students at Mazandaran University. Iranian Association for Cultural and Communication Studies, 15(55), 131-151. 22034/jcsc.2019.36674 [In Persian]
  • Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
  • Prokhorov, S. (2012). Social media and democracy: Facebook as a tool for the establishment of democracy in Egypt. Master Thesis. School of Arts and Communication. Malmo University. Available at :

https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1482268/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  • Ritzer, J. (2011). Sociological Theories, translated by Houshang Naibi, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  • Sadeghian, H., & Asadi, A. (2019). The Impact of Social and Virtual Media on the Democratization Process: A Case Study of the Turkish Justice and Development Party Government from 2002 to Now. Quarterly Journal of News Sciences, 8 (30), 194-175. https://www.mjourcom.ir/article_113769.html

[In Persian]

  • Saleh, N. (2012). Egypt’s digital activism and the Dictator’s Dilemma: An evaluation. Telecommunications Policy, 36(6), 476-483.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.04.001

  • Shekharkhah, Y., Saeedabadi, M.A., & Namaver, A. (2010). Presenting a Model for the Impact of Social Networks on the Development of Democracy in Iran: A Data-Based Study. New Media Studies, 6 (24), 36-1.

https://doi.org/10.22054/nms.2021.47781.856 [In Persian]

  • Tavakoli, F. (2011). The role of media in cultural democracy in the contemporary world. Interdisciplinary studies in media and culture, (1)1, 98-85. https://mediastudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_201.html [In Persian]
  • Unwin, T. (2012). Social media, democracy and good governance. In Background paper for the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association’s annual conference in Colombo, Sri Lanka, September.
  • V-Dem Institute. (2024). V-Dem Dataset v14. University of Gothenburg.

Retrieved from: https://www.v-dem.net

  • , H., Huber., B., & Straub., N. (2019). Social media and democracy. El profesional de la información. 27 (6). 1699-2407.

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.01